In Friday’s Reuters article Jamie Dimon was lauded by the PR crisis
management industry and warned by the legal beagles. Clearly, the two groups
should spend more time talking to each other. The best path for any corporate
leader in a similar position – and there do seem to be increasing numbers in this
club – is to come forth with an aggressive message that is as clear and open as
the crisis communication gurus suggest while also taking care avoid legal words
that lawyers will later pounce on.
As experts in
communication, we mostly agree that some message is better than no message. The
legal advisors have done a considerable amount of damage over the years by
shushing their clientele, a strategy mostly born of arrogance on the part of
the lawyers, plus a healthy dose of warranted fear for what the CEO, CFO, COO,
etc. will say. For example, while dispensing words of wisdom and talking about
the "court of public opinion", the public relations people, on the other
hand, will not have spent much time in the courtroom seeing their strategically
crafted message displayed on a ten by ten foot screen to a jury of Jamie
Dimon's peers day after day.
Marry the lawyers’
caution and experience, with the legal ramifications of being too clever, with
the count on honesty to carry the day philosophy. This strategy allows most any
misstep to at least get some salve applied while the real healing begins.
No comments:
Post a Comment